<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Luxurious Interior and Touchscreen for the 2011 Lincoln MKX Crossover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carguideblog.com/1489/luxurious-interior-and-touchscreen-for-the-2011-lincoln-mkx-crossover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carguideblog.com/1489/luxurious-interior-and-touchscreen-for-the-2011-lincoln-mkx-crossover/</link>
	<description>Car sense for the masses...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: 4x4Pakistan</title>
		<link>http://carguideblog.com/1489/luxurious-interior-and-touchscreen-for-the-2011-lincoln-mkx-crossover/comment-page-7/#comment-10493</link>
		<dc:creator>4x4Pakistan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 10:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carguideblog.com/?p=1489#comment-10493</guid>
		<description>With an improved interior, more powerful engine, decent handling, good fuel economy and lots of standard equipments, the 2011 Lincoln MKX is better engineered and tightly built vehicle. When it comes to midsize SUV, buyers usually prefer General Motors Cadillac SRX over Ford’s Lincoln MKX. However, I actually prefer MKX to the SRX due to better fuel economy, excellent fit and finish as well as decent acceleration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With an improved interior, more powerful engine, decent handling, good fuel economy and lots of standard equipments, the 2011 Lincoln MKX is better engineered and tightly built vehicle. When it comes to midsize SUV, buyers usually prefer General Motors Cadillac SRX over Ford’s Lincoln MKX. However, I actually prefer MKX to the SRX due to better fuel economy, excellent fit and finish as well as decent acceleration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papatomk</title>
		<link>http://carguideblog.com/1489/luxurious-interior-and-touchscreen-for-the-2011-lincoln-mkx-crossover/comment-page-7/#comment-8703</link>
		<dc:creator>papatomk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carguideblog.com/?p=1489#comment-8703</guid>
		<description>Beware of the dual climate control air conditioner, the regional rep stated the 2010 system will not be improved, the automatic mode system does not allow sufficient cooling﻿ when the ambient temp inside the vehicle is 80 degrees or less. The comfort must be attained by switching to manual and increasing the fan speed and dropping the temp to 60 for max cooling also changing the air to recirculate. This is lots of steps for such an expensive vehicle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware of the dual climate control air conditioner, the regional rep stated the 2010 system will not be improved, the automatic mode system does not allow sufficient cooling﻿ when the ambient temp inside the vehicle is 80 degrees or less. The comfort must be attained by switching to manual and increasing the fan speed and dropping the temp to 60 for max cooling also changing the air to recirculate. This is lots of steps for such an expensive vehicle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papatomk</title>
		<link>http://carguideblog.com/1489/luxurious-interior-and-touchscreen-for-the-2011-lincoln-mkx-crossover/comment-page-7/#comment-8312</link>
		<dc:creator>papatomk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carguideblog.com/?p=1489#comment-8312</guid>
		<description>Beware of the dual climate control air conditioner, the regional rep stated the 2010 system will not be improved, the automatic mode system does not allow sufficient cooling when the ambient temp inside the vehicle is 80 degrees or less. The comfort must be attained by switching to manual and increasing the fan speed and dropping the temp to 60 for max cooling also changing the air to recirculate. This is lots of steps for such an expensive vehicle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware of the dual climate control air conditioner, the regional rep stated the 2010 system will not be improved, the automatic mode system does not allow sufficient cooling when the ambient temp inside the vehicle is 80 degrees or less. The comfort must be attained by switching to manual and increasing the fan speed and dropping the temp to 60 for max cooling also changing the air to recirculate. This is lots of steps for such an expensive vehicle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fp3shb</title>
		<link>http://carguideblog.com/1489/luxurious-interior-and-touchscreen-for-the-2011-lincoln-mkx-crossover/comment-page-6/#comment-6940</link>
		<dc:creator>fp3shb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carguideblog.com/?p=1489#comment-6940</guid>
		<description>Damn, can you say garbage? Typical of a Lincoln though. They hoped the previous MKX would be a hit in it&#039;s segment, and like all of their other cars it was a fail, and this...once again will be a fail. All this is anyway is a gussied up Ford Edge, same body, windows, rear, and frontal set up. How sad. Ford, maybe Lincoln needs an also necessary fate as did Mercury. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, can you say garbage? Typical of a Lincoln though. They hoped the previous MKX would be a hit in it&#8217;s segment, and like all of their other cars it was a fail, and this&#8230;once again will be a fail. All this is anyway is a gussied up Ford Edge, same body, windows, rear, and frontal set up. How sad. Ford, maybe Lincoln needs an also necessary fate as did Mercury. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quessbee123</title>
		<link>http://carguideblog.com/1489/luxurious-interior-and-touchscreen-for-the-2011-lincoln-mkx-crossover/comment-page-6/#comment-6834</link>
		<dc:creator>quessbee123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carguideblog.com/?p=1489#comment-6834</guid>
		<description>@flatblackstrat Nice!  The volume guage is  VERY clever and, hightech!  Good job Lincoln...while, other automakers still uses knobs or, buttons! Lol.. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@flatblackstrat Nice!  The volume guage is  VERY clever and, hightech!  Good job Lincoln&#8230;while, other automakers still uses knobs or, buttons! Lol.. <img src="http://carguideblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif?cda6c1" alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quessbee123</title>
		<link>http://carguideblog.com/1489/luxurious-interior-and-touchscreen-for-the-2011-lincoln-mkx-crossover/comment-page-6/#comment-6835</link>
		<dc:creator>quessbee123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carguideblog.com/?p=1489#comment-6835</guid>
		<description>Nice!  The volume guage is  VERY clever and, hightech!  Good job Lincoln...while, other automakers still uses knobs or, buttons! Lol.. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice!  The volume guage is  VERY clever and, hightech!  Good job Lincoln&#8230;while, other automakers still uses knobs or, buttons! Lol.. <img src="http://carguideblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif?cda6c1" alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funtime2022</title>
		<link>http://carguideblog.com/1489/luxurious-interior-and-touchscreen-for-the-2011-lincoln-mkx-crossover/comment-page-6/#comment-6311</link>
		<dc:creator>funtime2022</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carguideblog.com/?p=1489#comment-6311</guid>
		<description>@MegaPlatano809 that can be frustrating :S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MegaPlatano809 that can be frustrating :S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: parthshin</title>
		<link>http://carguideblog.com/1489/luxurious-interior-and-touchscreen-for-the-2011-lincoln-mkx-crossover/comment-page-6/#comment-4951</link>
		<dc:creator>parthshin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 19:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carguideblog.com/?p=1489#comment-4951</guid>
		<description>@MegaPlatano809 true dat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MegaPlatano809 true dat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheWWEUploaderHQ</title>
		<link>http://carguideblog.com/1489/luxurious-interior-and-touchscreen-for-the-2011-lincoln-mkx-crossover/comment-page-5/#comment-4741</link>
		<dc:creator>TheWWEUploaderHQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carguideblog.com/?p=1489#comment-4741</guid>
		<description>Prefer the 2010 Exterior</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prefer the 2010 Exterior</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RossEnzo</title>
		<link>http://carguideblog.com/1489/luxurious-interior-and-touchscreen-for-the-2011-lincoln-mkx-crossover/comment-page-5/#comment-4517</link>
		<dc:creator>RossEnzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carguideblog.com/?p=1489#comment-4517</guid>
		<description>the slider thing i had on my 91 bmw 325 thats nothing new</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the slider thing i had on my 91 bmw 325 thats nothing new</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/16 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 698/698 objects using disk: basic

Served from: carguideblog.com @ 2012-05-17 17:47:09 -->
