Comments on: 2011 Honda CR-Z Sport Hybrid Coupe Production Model and Mugen CR-Z – update http://carguideblog.com/1502/2011-honda-cr-z-sport-hybrid-coupe-production-model/ Car sense for the masses... Thu, 17 May 2012 22:05:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Honda CR-Z Mugen officially revealed | Carguide Blog http://carguideblog.com/1502/2011-honda-cr-z-sport-hybrid-coupe-production-model/comment-page-43/#comment-10663 Honda CR-Z Mugen officially revealed | Carguide Blog Thu, 19 May 2011 03:20:19 +0000 http://carguideblog.com/?p=1502#comment-10663 [...] of 197 horsepower and 181 pound-feet of torque.With the 110 pounds shaved off from the chassis, the Honda CR-Z Mugen is expected to have an acceleration time of 0-60 mph equally as the Civic Type R, which is [...] [...] of 197 horsepower and 181 pound-feet of torque.With the 110 pounds shaved off from the chassis, the Honda CR-Z Mugen is expected to have an acceleration time of 0-60 mph equally as the Civic Type R, which is [...]

]]> By: Mugen Honda CR-Z pumps out 197 horsepower along with a new body kit | Carguide Blog http://carguideblog.com/1502/2011-honda-cr-z-sport-hybrid-coupe-production-model/comment-page-43/#comment-10434 Mugen Honda CR-Z pumps out 197 horsepower along with a new body kit | Carguide Blog Tue, 26 Apr 2011 02:19:45 +0000 http://carguideblog.com/?p=1502#comment-10434 [...] pumps out 197 horsepower and 181 pound-feet of torque, and that is almost a 50% power-jump from the stock 113 horsepower and 107 lb-ft of torque. Mugen Euro has also managed to sync the added-power with [...] [...] pumps out 197 horsepower and 181 pound-feet of torque, and that is almost a 50% power-jump from the stock 113 horsepower and 107 lb-ft of torque. Mugen Euro has also managed to sync the added-power with [...]

]]> By: lotusboy24 http://carguideblog.com/1502/2011-honda-cr-z-sport-hybrid-coupe-production-model/comment-page-43/#comment-8751 lotusboy24 Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:16:21 +0000 http://carguideblog.com/?p=1502#comment-8751 @Vasilovits22 I dont know why they wasted the time commin up wit this stupid, wanna be CRX..I agree, no honda will ever be able to replace the 87-91 CRX.. @Vasilovits22 I dont know why they wasted the time commin up wit this stupid, wanna be CRX..I agree, no honda will ever be able to replace the 87-91 CRX..

]]> By: etoyotarockshsucks http://carguideblog.com/1502/2011-honda-cr-z-sport-hybrid-coupe-production-model/comment-page-42/#comment-8680 etoyotarockshsucks Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:11:40 +0000 http://carguideblog.com/?p=1502#comment-8680 eww another falliure. 1.5 fun to drive ha eww another falliure. 1.5 fun to drive ha

]]> By: glock19x300 http://carguideblog.com/1502/2011-honda-cr-z-sport-hybrid-coupe-production-model/comment-page-42/#comment-8675 glock19x300 Sun, 26 Sep 2010 00:12:56 +0000 http://carguideblog.com/?p=1502#comment-8675 I think that most people misunderstand the purpose of this car, its not a sports car nor is it meant to be... its sporty... FOR A HYBRID. the only way it is like a CRX is the looks... its not meant to be the ultimate driving machine, just a fuel efficient car thats easier to live with than most fuel sipping turds. I think that most people misunderstand the purpose of this car, its not a sports car nor is it meant to be… its sporty… FOR A HYBRID. the only way it is like a CRX is the looks… its not meant to be the ultimate driving machine, just a fuel efficient car thats easier to live with than most fuel sipping turds.

]]> By: matrixloader http://carguideblog.com/1502/2011-honda-cr-z-sport-hybrid-coupe-production-model/comment-page-42/#comment-8650 matrixloader Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:17:50 +0000 http://carguideblog.com/?p=1502#comment-8650 Honda failed again with this one. if they wanted to make it fuel efficient they should of at least made it past the 40mpg mark, the old crx HF got 49-54mpg and the regular crx dx and si got 33-37 mpg, keep note that those where non hybrids. this crz should of ditched the hybrid motor for at least the current civic's single cam 1.8 motor giving it 140hp and still keeping it at 34mpg. You suck honda! I hope hyundai's upcoming veloster shows you how it should of been done. Honda failed again with this one. if they wanted to make it fuel efficient they should of at least made it past the 40mpg mark, the old crx HF got 49-54mpg and the regular crx dx and si got 33-37 mpg, keep note that those where non hybrids.

this crz should of ditched the hybrid motor for at least the current civic’s single cam 1.8 motor giving it 140hp and still keeping it at 34mpg. You suck honda! I hope hyundai’s upcoming veloster shows you how it should of been done.

]]> By: 2048scotty http://carguideblog.com/1502/2011-honda-cr-z-sport-hybrid-coupe-production-model/comment-page-42/#comment-8649 2048scotty Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:19:45 +0000 http://carguideblog.com/?p=1502#comment-8649 that looks awful that looks awful

]]> By: guidounee http://carguideblog.com/1502/2011-honda-cr-z-sport-hybrid-coupe-production-model/comment-page-42/#comment-8618 guidounee Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:10:51 +0000 http://carguideblog.com/?p=1502#comment-8618 do you ever try it exhibitir ? do you ever try it exhibitir ?

]]> By: dwarftoad http://carguideblog.com/1502/2011-honda-cr-z-sport-hybrid-coupe-production-model/comment-page-41/#comment-8610 dwarftoad Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:53:05 +0000 http://carguideblog.com/?p=1502#comment-8610 37 MPG is the best they can do? I thought he said it was supposed to be fuel efficient.... 37 MPG is the best they can do? I thought he said it was supposed to be fuel efficient….

]]> By: ROBCRX http://carguideblog.com/1502/2011-honda-cr-z-sport-hybrid-coupe-production-model/comment-page-41/#comment-8553 ROBCRX Sat, 18 Sep 2010 20:00:27 +0000 http://carguideblog.com/?p=1502#comment-8553 I'll keep my 1990 CRX thank you very much. I’ll keep my 1990 CRX thank you very much.

]]>