• RSS
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter

Carguide Blog

audipikespeakTTS Audi TTS Plans to Conquer Pikes Peak

Audi is teaming up with various labs from computer hardware to dynamics control.  It plans to conquer  Pikes Peak of California and claims as king of the mountain.  You may know that Pikes Peak is the ultimate challenge to test the skills of not only the race driver but also the car.  Every twist and turn of Pikes Peak requires undivided attention; one false move you could end down the ravine.  Many tried but few succeeded the ultimate goal, because you need a car that is one with the road and the driver (not on this car).

To create such a car, you need to call upon all the thinking and experience of people in many related fields. Audi has teamed up with Volkswagen Electronics Research Lab, Stanford Dynamics Design Lab, and Sun Microsystems for the central processing unit.  When you put all these teams together, you get a telematic control system that let the driver becomes with the car.  Every year many cars come to claim the best speed time to the top, and the Audi TTS is just another car waiting to be eaten up by the mountain.  Will the Audi TTS Pikes Peak able to claim such a name or will it create another statistic category “tin can” who got crushed by the mountain, we’ll see?

[Source: Audi]

All about the Audi Pikes Peak TTS

The Audi Pikes Peak TTS is nicknamed “Shelley” by the Stanford DDL after Michele Mouton, arguably the most successful female rally driver to date who played a significant part in Audi’s racing history.

Goal
To collaborate with Stanford to build an autonomous vehicle capable of completing the Pikes Peak International Hill Climb in a reasonable time using rally driving techniques.

Team:

Volkswagen Electronics Research Lab
Convert a vehicle to drive by wire, develop a safety architecture to ensure a reliable autonomous drive with no safety driver, and implement Stanford’s control algorithms on a system jointly developed with Sun Microsystems.

Stanford Dynamics Design Lab
Develop robust control algorithms that enable the vehicle to drive at the limits of handling on a variety of surfaces, and lets it complete the Pikes Peak course.

Sun Microsystems
Specify a hardware platform that can run Stanford’s real time algorithms and develop a framework that enables Real Time Java to the vehicle CAN system.



Vehicle:
Make and model: 2009 Audi TTS
Engine: 2.0L Turbocharged I4 DOHC
Transmission: 6-Speed S tronic automatic transmission
Fuel Consumption: City: 21 mpg

Highway: 29 mpg
Combined: 24

Power: 265 hp & 6000 rpm1
Torque: 258 lb-ft. @ 2500 – 5000 rpm
Top speed: 155 (249km/h),
Acceleration: 0-60mph: 4.9sec

Weight incl. sensor: ~ 1470kg.


Drive-By-Wire:
Steering: Modified ”APA-BS” (Axially Parallel Actuation-Braun-Schweig), a new production electric power steering system with direct by-wire control through custom ERL Electronics.
Throttle: Electronics from VW ERL reproduce signals to emulate a driver pressing on the throttle.
Brakes: Active brake booster from Continental with by-wire control through ERL Electronics.
Gear: Modification of signals exchanged between transmission and gear shifter using custom ERL electronics on production hardware.
Parking brake: Use of stock electric parking brake from VW Passat through a custom ERL electronic interface utilized on Junior.

Safety:
In addition to multiple redundant systems for vehicle control, and emergency shutdown the Pikes Peak TTS has a Solaris based system running a Java RTS system monitor that can perform a vehicle shutdown if it determines conditions have become unsafe.

As a backup solution, the vehicle includes a telemetry system that can transmit all vehicle parameters to a receiving station up to 20 miles away which can also shut down the vehicle remotely, or order the safety systems to engage and bring the car to a controlled stop.

Sensors:
The Pikes Peak TTS utilizes an Applanix POS LV420 GPS and Inertial Measurement Unit to measure its position.

Vehicle Control:
Hardware:
Two independent systems are being used in the Pikes Peak TTS, the initial controller development is being done on an XPC target using Matlab and Simulink which are the standard research tools from Stanford’s DDL. The final vehicle controls are being run on ruggedized custom built solutions running a Core2Duo CPU and Solaris operating system that is being developed in collaboration with Sun Microsystems.

Software:
The Stanford University Dynamics Design Lab is developing cutting edge control algorithms that look to optimize the ability to control the vehicle under the most demanding circumstances. As these algorithms are finalized they will be merged into a new framework being developed at the ERL based that shares many components with other ERL Autonomous driving projects.

Posted by Vincent Van On November - 6 - 2009
  • lordjavathe3rd

    FAKE!!

  • new2hackin

    @smradlavaponozka

    What sort of reason is that? Humans don’t program human error into machines, they don’t give machines human behaviour, machines are machines and cannot make errors in judgement or perform stupid behaviour, they don’t get emotional nor make calculated mistakes. Their only problems are hardware faults, bugs in coding and that’s about it. These things can be remedied easily with simple maintenance, and happen far less often than the myriad of mistakes humans can make.

  • smradlavaponozka

    @onekillerdrummer no sorry…americans dont have the quality they haved…and in the begining i wrote that we would see the technology in real life in about 20 years ecause it has still to do a lot of testing and because it will take time till people will trust it…so read everything and then write…DUMBO :-)

  • smradlavaponozka

    @new2hackin read! i wrote that computers arent reliable BECAUSE they are made by human!

  • new2hackin

    @smradlavaponozka

    Computers don’t make mistakes, humans using them do. They will be a LOT more safer than humans driving them, and they can’t get drunk or high either.

  • new2hackin

    @jklsd

    Then you are a minority and you may go jump off a cliff if you are bored. :)

  • onekillerdrummer

    @smradlavaponozka Actually euros AND Americans know how to make cars. I think its just YOU that doesn’t get it. Stuff your segregation comments up your butt dumbo!

  • catapaultpenguin

    @smradlavaponozka you said computers aren’t reliable, an ecu (engine control unit) is one of the most reliable parts of a car they don’t malfunction often at all and they are computers.

  • smradlavaponozka

    @catapaultpenguin look i dont know where are you eorking and i dont even want to know…your a jerk? sorry but an ECU(european) and a totally self controled car is something else…i work for car companies…i know what are cars mae from…but americans dont :D

  • waynetg

    Go Java!!

  • iLikeGfx

    @GerbilGod7 At 0:17 you have two potential out of bounds exceptions in the first and second line of your program entry function main(). You should always check bounds.
    Not good to show that one off.

  • catapaultpenguin

    @smradlavaponozka So you don’t think the ecu’s in current cars are reliable? People also said smart cars couldn’t become popular because people would be afraid to drive those too. Despite that, progress happened.

  • smradlavaponozka

    @catapaultpenguin you dont have to remind me that…im working for car companies :-) and no its not still reliable enought to let the car take all the control…and even if it was…many people wouldnt trust it…

  • catapaultpenguin

    @smradlavaponozka computers aren’t reliable? I remind you that you car is already controlled by computers, just not driven by them.

  • Mikzarn

    @racekidishere
    And maybe deaths related to ‘driving fun’ are gone.

    Take your ‘fun’ driving to your local race track.

Sunday, February 5, 2012