• RSS
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Newsletter

Carguide Blog

NISSAN leaf Nissan Green Car   LEAF  Zero Emission Tour in November

Be the first to see the Nissan LEAF in person.  An invitation was sent out a few weeks ago to see the Nissan LEAF Zero Emission Tour in Southern California in November.  The tour will begin in Southern California on November 13, 2009 and end in New York City on February 14, 2010.  In case if you already missed the Southern California invitation, you can sign up here.  If you sign up for the RSVP, you will get a bag of goodies at the show.

The Nissan LEAF is the first 100% electric, zero emission, green car that will be produced by Nissan, and will be available in the near end of 2010.  Just in case if you are interested in the specs of this green car, here they are:

Seating 5
Max speed Over 90mph
Drive powertrain layout Front motor, front drive
Battery Laminated lithium-ion battery
Electric motor (power, torque) High-response synchronous AC motor 80kW, 280Nm
Battery capacity/power 24kWh/Over 90kW
Cruising range Over 100 miles
Major features Dedicated IT system
LenghtxWidthxHeight 175 x 69.7 x61 inches
Wheelbase 106 inches

Posted by Vincent Van On November - 10 - 2009
  • datpimpinboy

    @logansGT No. I think i clearly separated my tow sentences by a period. I said I liked the design, then I said why the design is like this. I like the design as it is, it doesnt matter if it was an internal combustion car or an EV, to me, it looks good.. Sure enough, it’s no ferrari, but it is a very descent looking car.

  • logansGT

    @datpimpinboy – You may not think that “this is a good looking car” if it didn’t reduce energy consumption. Is it possible that it’s function has influenced your opinion?
    In any case, I don’t think that a car needs to look like a kitchen appliance. There are many beautiful aerodynamic designs, but the Leaf is not a shining example of form following function.

  • datpimpinboy

    @jonnyaussie no they cant

  • datpimpinboy

    @logansGT to me this is a good looking car. This car is just made like this “because”, the design is made to create the best aerodynamics thus reducing energy consumption. You cant expect Nissan to do magic. It was either to do the nice car you want, or get better miles per charge.

  • boringlecture

    I was wondering if it would be a good idea to have a single windmill turbine behind the front grille, to help charge up the battery while you drive

  • scott231us

    Lastly, 15 years ago, they didn’t have this battery technology, so they had to use batteries weighing 8-11 times more in weight and took up a lot of space. These new batteries are only the fraction in weight, much more efficient, durable,can handle more diverse charging.. Technically you could double (or triple) the battery capacity, so you could possible drive a week without sunlight.. That battery can pick up the slack and the solar cells can charge whenever there is just a bit of sunlight.

  • scott231us

    Also solar cells today, produce about 4-5 times more power than just 15-20 years ago. Since the average consumer only drives 60-90 mins a day (or 20-50 miles), 90% of the time during the day the car just sits.. So we only require it’s use 10% of the time (typically) If you do the math here, 1/10th and 5 times higher solar cell efficiency, means we only need 1/50th the solar cells (or 1/50th the sunlight) to make this work compared to the solar cell operated cars 15 years ago.

  • scott231us

    Even on cloudy/rainy days, there is some charge (just at a lower current/wattage output) with solar cells.. Plus, most only commute 20-50 miles a day.. If you think about it, most only drive their cars about 10% of the day, so while the car is just sitting, it shouldn’t take but a fraction of the power from Solar Cells, compared to cars that ran 1,000 miles cont with solar cells 15 years ago. So we have 10 times more charging time (power input) per hour of needed output.
    Also, solar cells

  • wheely132

    ehh i guess it is pretty cool but if you go to a charging station, plan on waiting for 30 mins in stead of 3 mins!

  • dvdfrnzwbr

    Electric cars can only take you 50 miles down the highway then you got to head back. Do you really need an expensive EV car to do that? A $500 beater could accomplish that distance and you would have $29,500 in you pocket for fuel and repairs.

  • dvdfrnzwbr

    Electric cars can only take you 50 minutes down the highway then you got to head back. Do you really need an expensive EV car to do that? A $500 beater could accomplish that distance.

  • wildcats520

    @scott231us what if its a cloudy/rainy day? wouldnt the solar power not work?

  • scott231us

    If this worked for solar cell powered cars 15 years ago, then surely with our new solar cell and battery efficiency, this should be a snap! I just question why haven’t we done this yet? Stacking the car with solar cells beneth a fiberglass auto body would only cost $1,000 – $2,000.. Well worth the cost for endless, free driving, without the hassle of manually charging it.

  • scott231us

    Why not add solar cells to all these electric cars??? 15 years ago cars we running 1000 miles cont.. However since then, both solar cells and battery technology have become much more efficient and can produce 4-10 times the power in the same space and weight of solar cells and batteries 15 years ago.. Even when it’s cloudy, solar cells can help extend or charge the batteries.. We rarely drive beyond miles, so the batteries could fully charge back while we’re at work, shopping, or whatever.

  • banacek8675

    This is why the Arabs are racing to buy up land in Bolivia and Chile. These countries have the world’s largest lithium reserves. Once they control the lithium, they can jack up the prices keeping us dependent on oil.

Saturday, February 11, 2012